More madness in lawless London

JS147904943

It’s  not exactly “BREAKING NEWS” that London has been center of some knife and gun crimes over the past 6 months, so when it’s reported on a daily basis, that another group of yobs carrying zombie knives and riding on mopeds, it doesn’t come as a shock to the Great British public.

But what exactly is being done about it?

I mean let’s admit it, the police are too afraid to make arrests if the offenders are black due to them being accused of racism, the scummy yobs know their rights and know that a ‘no comment’ interview will buy them a bit more time until the police find any conclusive evidence of their involvement and the courts will only give them a slap on the wrist or a petty few months in prison which will teach them sod all. What an amazing justice system we do have…

So what is the latest happenings in the capital?

The police have released dashcam images (above) showing the frightening moments where robbery suspects jumped on a victims car bonnet, a Mazda MX5, as it was parked at a set of traffic lights, in Finchley, North London, on Saturday 2nd June (2018).
Two mopeds, carrying four males, rode up ton either side of the car. One of the suspects  was wielding a hammer and another was brandishing a large ‘Zombie style’ knife.
One of the suspects jumped on the bonnet of the car, kicking the windscreen twice until it broke. The suspects then jumped back onto the mopeds and headed west towards Brent Cross.
The driver of the car suffered a knife cut to his arm and was later discharged from hospital.
Detectives from Barnet CID are investigating but say no arrests have been made at this stage.

How long are these incidents going to go on for? What is being done to protect innocent citizens from these gangs? And what will it take for this madness to be stopped?

Advertisements

Graphic junk food packaging? Welcome to 2018

JS147904943

A study by the University of Melbourne and Cancer Council Victoria has found that putting graphic health warnings- similar to those found of cigarette packaging- could prompt people to abandon “hedonistic impulses” and choose healthier food options.
The study monitored the brain activity of 95 people as they were shown 50 foods such as crisps, chocolate bars, biscuits, nuts, fruits and vegetables and it found that warning labels prompted people to exercise more self-control rather than act on impulses…

I could go on about the other content in the article but I stopped reading it because it was annoying me. At the end of the day people will buy junk food regardless of what is featured on the packaging. The public have been aware of the health risks of junk food for years, this is not news to us, so surely this just proves that people will continue to buy the foods they want despite the risks?

There were health warnings issued on cigarettes but people still smoke so what difference has it made really? What are they going to do next? Put health warning images on alcohol?

Why can’t we just be left to make our own decisions without the interference of the health police? I don’t believe people will be swayed so what is the point?

On the run: A Freedom of Movement balls up

JS147904943

A pianist, Jacek Serafin (above) raped a student and was able to flee the UK after his arrest because EU’s Freedom of Movement  allowed him to board a Eurostar without his passport.

Serafin had his passport confiscated by police after he was arrested for the sexual assault of his 22 year-old student, whose drink was spiked. However, on April 26th (2018) just a few days before he was due to face a retrial for rape, he used an ID card to board a Eurostar train, bound for France, and vanished.
It is believed that he is not in his native country of Poland, but police have not been able to make contact despite efforts to track him down.

In Serafin’s absence, Judge Anthony Cross QC, posed the sentence of 14 years in prison as soon as Serafin is found.

Can we have a huge round of applause for the EU seen as they have screwed up yet again! What a bloody joke?! But how was he able to board a Eurostar without a passport I hear you ask? Well, he was able to because the EU Directive 2004/38/EC states that any EU citizen who stays in another EU Member State for less that 3 months, need only a valid ID to move between Member States.
So, in other words, an EU citizen can go to another Member State, commit a crime and avoid prosecution by State hopping. Great.

And people question why Brexit is happening?!

Good luck to the police on finding this cretin though, however, I doubt he will be found or return back to the UK in a hurry.

Late starts for obese employees? Give me a break!

JS147904943

A government adviser has stated that obese workers should be allowed to start work late in order to avoid the rush-hour crush and should also have the right to seek legal action against their employer should they not get a job or promotion due to their weight.

Doesn’t this make you sick?! If they are able to work then they are able to get there on time. If they want to avoid the rush-hour then they could always leave earlier. It’s not rocket science! So what if they’re at work earlier, they could always use that time to their advantage and do something productive instead of complaining about being obese and the struggle of getting to work. If their weight bothers them that much they could always do something about it instead of inconveniencing their employers and fellow colleagues. It shouldn’t be up to the employer to make sure that member of staff is at work for their start time, that is up to the employee, obese or not. And later start times means more work for the people who are at work on time because they will have to pick up the slack until the obese worker gets their ass in, which could in turn create resentment in the workplace and result in the obese worker not wanting to go to work because of the tension they’re getting from their colleagues… It’s a can of worms that really should not be opened.

And suing the employer for them not getting the job/promotion because of their weight is just ridiculous! Prove that is the reason why they didn’t get the promotion! Unless the employer actually said “You’re not suitable for that position because you’re fat” then there is very little that can be done. This is just going to be a huge waste of time for employers, employees and solicitors.

No, I’m sorry but I don’t agree with the government adviser who came up with this. I think he needs to take my advice and shut up!

Another child rapist: What is happening to the youth of today?

JS147904943

The Dorset Echo featured an article about police arresting an 11 year-old boy on suspicion of raping a 7 year-old boy in a Dorset village.
The alleged attack is said to have happened at an outside location on Monday the 14th of May (2018), close to the victims home.

It is said, by the victims mother, that he was playing outside when he went out of view around a corner. When her son returned, a short while later, his clothing was in disarray and she seemed subdued.
Upon questioning, the boy told his parents that he had been raped.

Dorset police have confirmed that they are investigating the incident.
An 11 year-old boy was arrested on suspicion of rape and has been released under investigation to allow officers to establish the full circumstances around the incident.”

So another ‘alleged’ child rapist. Another child victim who has had their childhood innocence taken away and been left traumatized. What the hell is with kids these days? This is the second incident of this kind I have wrote about in the past few months.

11 year-old boys should be playing football, video games, whatever, not committing crimes or raping young children! Luckily, the offender in this case is over the age of criminal responsibility so, hopefully, they will be prosecuted accordingly to give the victim and his family some sense of justice.

You have to wonder about the offenders parents though, I mean how many 11 year-old boys actually know what rape is let alone know how to carry out the offending act? How did that boy learn about how to rape? Did he learn it from pornography? Did he learn it online? Did he plan it? There are so many questions! And if he did learn it from porn or online, then why didn’t his parents have measures in place to prevent him accessing such sites and information?
It is concerning that he knew that he had to get his victim alone, that he had to be careful not to be caught, that he knew what technique to use to carry out the actual rape, that he knew exactly what he was doing.

I can only imagine, if this goes to trial, the public outcry there will be. The public don’t want to protect child criminals, especially those who commit severe offences such as rape or murder, there will be cries for the offender to be strung up!

And, in all honesty, can you blame them?

Justice for lies

JS147904943

Between Jannuary and March 2016, A Costin (above) accused three men of rape and a fourth man of physical assault.
She told police how one of the men raped her on the carpet of her home after taking her clothes off. The man was arrested but released after police managed to confirm his alibi. However, Costin then made another allegation against the man, this time claiming that he had sexually assaulted her by grabbing her breasts. Once again, the man was arrested but released after proving a compelling alibi… He was on holiday at the time. Unfortunately, the man also suffered from learning difficulties which made the allegations even harder on him as a victim of Costin’s lies.

The second man who was accused by Costin, similarily raped her in her own home. She claimed that he ‘forced her onto the sofa and pulled down her clothes and raped her’. Police were able to prove that the man was watching TV at home at the time of the alleged attack. Again, Costin brought another false claim of rape against the man, but this time he was able to prove that he was eating a take-away dinner at home at the time of the alleged second attack.

The third alleged attack followed a similar pattern and all three men said the allegations had affected their relationships with women and led to them suffering abuse, lost sleep and needing medication. One of them was left traumatized by the accusation as he too has mental health problems.

Costin, who has previous convictions mostly involving harassment, has self-harm issues going back to childhood and suffers from ADHD, autistic spectrum disorder and borderline personality disorder.
The case was referred to the Appeal Court after a lawyer from the Attorney General, James Wright QC, attacked her previous sentence of three years community service as being ‘unduly lenient’.

“In light of her [Costin] guilty pleas and a very substantial personal mitigation we will reduce that figure [six years] to four years” – Lady Justice Hallett.

So because some nutjob accuses three men of rape and one of physical assault, the men accused have their lives and reputations ruined and all she gets is four years? Do you really think these men will be seen as innocent? People always believe the bad stuff and society has the view that if you’re arrested then you must have committed the crime, not that some deluded psycho has lied for god knows whatever reason.

And surely if Costin has mental health problems then she should be put into a mental hospital rather than a prison? She needs medical help to manage her mental health otherwise she is never going to change. She needs coaching on what is appropriate in society and taught that lying about rape is not acceptable.

Women, like Costin, who lie about being raped make it so much more difficult for genuine victims to prove their case in court. It also makes it virtually impossible for the police and the legal system to believe Costin if she ever was to be raped. And she only has herself to blame.

The sentence may not be up to much but alas justice has been done. And I can only hope that the men falsely accused can, with time, get their lives back on track and put this sordid ordeal behind them.

Death in custody

JS147904943  Tyrone Quinn, sentenced to six years in prison after causing death by dangerous driving whilst under the influence of cocaine and alcohol, was pronounced dead in custody at HMP Northumberland on Monday 14th of May (2018).

Quinn was serving his second prison sentence when he died and had a string of previous convictions.
He had previously been banned from driving for 6 months in August 2015, after he had crashed into an off-duty police sergeant in December 2014.
Then, in May 2016, he was jailed for 16 weeks for assaulting a 77-year-old man in an unprovoked attack. However, Quinn was released in July 2016, just six days before he got behind the wheel of the BMW Coupe, whilst under the influence of cocaine and alcohol, which resulted in him crashing the car and causing the death of his passenger and friend, James.

So, as you can see, he is hardly the law abiding model citizen. And yet you have the Face Book comments by people who think the scumbag should get sympathy and criticizing the staff at HMP Northumberland.

Truth is, and I will probably be crucified for saying this, if Mr Quinn hadn’t of been such a waste of space and had been on the right side of the law then his death would have been prevented. However, no one will see it this way, people would rather see him as a victim and heap the responsibility of his death on the HMP staff.
The staff can only do so much and if the prisoners were on 24-hour surveillance then you know someone would tell them that it was against their Human   Rights, so what are the staff supposed to do?

There was also numerous comments on the diabolical BBC Panorama program that was filmed at HMP Northumberland. Does it occur to people that only the serious stuff that happened was filmed and broadcast? I mean it’s just strange that the undercover officer had to go through 9 weeks training and was at the prison for a total of 11 weeks and the footage that was shown was all he got. Surely if it was as bad as he was making out then there would have been something a little more serious than some prisoners taking spice and threatening staff. What about the good side of the prison? He didn’t show the workshops where the prisoners make things for charity, he didn’t show the library or the education wing which helps prisoners better themselves. The BBC knew exactly what to look for and the majority of society fell for it, hook, line and sinker.

It’s hardly breaking news that there’s drugs, mobile phones and other banned items found in prisons, it happens in ALL prisons. So why don’t the BBC film inside HMP Frankland or Strangeways? Is it because those prisons belong to HMP and not privately ran by Sodexo, like HMP Northumberland? The undercover journalist didn’t make out that the staff in HMP prisons are out of their depth, like he did with the Sodexo staff. And you know why? Because the BBC is government owned, just like the HMP prisons.

Anyway, getting back to the death in custody, I noticed a comment on The Chronicle Live’s Face Book page which said “there are so many young men dying in that prison”, and it took all my will power not to comment back saying that if they hadn’t of broken the law then they wouldn’t of been there and would still be alive. It’s not rocket science!

I guess the silver lining of Quinn’s death is that he can’t cause harm to anyone else in the general public and no more public money will be wasted on keeping his scummy ass.

Eight-year-old rapist: No justice for the victim

domestic_abuse_graphic_A_orange

I was reading through news articles on the Daily Mail’s website and came across a story which annoyed the hell out of me. It was about a mother who was speaking out about her eight-year-old son’s rape.

The mother, let’s call her Mo, told sources that the attacker was her sons school friend who had went to their house on a play-date to play with Lego.
She said that the two boys went upstairs into her sons room where the attacker wedged the door shut with a chair, closed the curtain and asked the victim to show his genitals. He then proceeded to rape him, telling him not to say anything to his parents as they would be angry with him.
The victim revealed what had happened during his bedtime routine when his mother had asked why he had been upset when the other boy had gone home. The other boy is said to have attempted to rape the victim on four other occasions before this incident.

Mo reported the incident to the police but was told that there was nothing they could do as the attacker was under the age of criminal culpability. Her son has been left with severe depression and Mo states that he threatens to self harm and keeps ‘wishing to die’.

THIS IS A DISGRACE! That poor child has had his innocence and childhood taken away from him by someone who he considered to be a friend and the law says that there is nothing they can do due to the offender being under the age of criminal responsibility? Really? So what we let eight year-old rapists off the hook because the law stated they’re two years under the age to be prosecuted? We let them off so they can do it again and again to other victims? What lesson is that teaching them? What justice is that giving the victim?

Screw criminal responsibility guidelines!

And it must be asked, how an eight-year-old knows how to carry out such an act? How did he know to wedge the door shut and to threaten the victim so he would keep quiet? Does that not scream that the offender has witnessed this at some point? The fact that he wedged the door shut and made threats so no one would find out, screams that he knew what he was doing was wrong and that he was worried about the consequences if people found out.

Convict the little bastard is what I say! If he is capable of rape at the age of eight, what crimes will he be capable of when he is older?

Time to nip this in the bud before we have another serial offender on our hands.

More Money for Maddie madness

JS147904943Hunt for Maddie gets cash: Government approves Scotland Yard’s ‘£150,000 boost’ to their seven-year search for missing Madeline McCann while London suffers murder epidemic- Daily Mail website.

I saw this article and I was raging!

Last month, Duncan Simm, a friend of my partners, went missing whilst on a night out during his studies at St Andrews University in Scotland. Despite searches and public appeals for information, as well as countless social media pleas, he is yet to be found. The police suspect that he could have been buried under concrete in one of the trenches which was being worked on at the time of his disappearance but there are no certainties.
Had Duncan’s family had a £150,000 boost from the government to assist with finding him? No, they haven’t. Has any other missing person, or child for that matter, had that level of financial support from the government? No, they haven’t. They would have been told that they have all the support available through their local police force. There is absolutely no way they would get the obscene amount of financial help the McCann’s have received.

Also, any other parents would have been hauled in by social services and convicted with child neglect had they of gone on holiday and left their children in the hotel room whilst they went on the piss with their friends. So why weren’t the McCann’s dragged through the system? Surely it makes it worse that they were both people of professions and should have known better?

Why is there STILL so much public money going into this investigation? Especially when all of the published evidence is pointing to Kate and Gerry McCann.
It has to be asked, if there was an abductor, then why did they only take Maddie? Why not take the twins as well? Why was there no evidence of a forced entry? Did they leave the room unlocked? If so, why? They were staying in a hotel, surely they would have had the sense to make sure their kids were safe?
How was Maddie’s blood and DNA found in a rental car they hired AFTER she went missing if they had nothing to do with the disappearance? Why did they wash Maddie’s stuffed toy?

There are so many unanswered questions!

And while our government throw money at the McCann’s to continue the search for their ‘missing’ daughter, the REAL problems that the country are facing remain unresolved.
I’m sure that £150,000 could be put to better use. It could fund more police officer positions, trainee nurses, shelters and support for domestic abuse victims, it could also be used to help tackle the growing number of knife/gun crimes in London.

What makes this case so important?
What hold do they McCann’s have over our government?

When will people say enough is enough?

UPDATE: I would just like to add that Kate McCann has made a whopping £84,000 in royalties from her book about her daughter’s disappearance… Does that mean she can give £84,000 back to the government to replace some of the £150,000 boost that Scotland Yard was granted in order to assist with the search? I don’t see that happening somehow do you?

A rant about Generation Y

JS147904943I have noticed of late that there have been number of articles concerning these so-called millennials, which are a generation of people (aka Generation Y) who are considered to be under the age of 35 (according to the Daily Mail).

The latest article I read involving the Generation Y was published on the Daily Mail website and stated that Sainsbury’s is to start selling raw meat in touch-free packaging for the people who are squeamish about touching raw meat. Now, don’t get me wrong, the concept is a pretty good idea and I’m sure it will sell and make them a few bob, but we really have to wonder what kind of generation we are raising here, I mean we already have the people who are offended over the slightest thing, we can’t make a joke or a throw-away comment these days without someone crying outrage and it being classed as a hate-crime because someone took it too seriously.
Kids cartoons have become more PC too and don’t even get me started on the freedom of speech on social media platforms- there is no such thing as freedom of speech these days.
Newspapers are constantly having to print apologies because of the articles offending someone and we have numerous products being sold  which makes people less and less subject to the real world, take those motion-sensor hand sanitser things for example, just press the bloody top for gods sake! Yes hygiene is important but bloody hell people have taken it to the extreme!
Kids used to be able to have conker competitions at school without any rules but these days there are either rules establishing that kids wear goggles if they have conker fights or they are just purely banned because someone could get hurt. There was none of this crap back when I was at school.

So it makes me wonder what kind of generation we are raising. Are we raising a generation where everything will be medically sanitised and no one will have a strong enough immune system to fight off a common cold? Or are we raising a peace-keeping generation where no one will say boo to a ghost just in case it opens the ‘I’m offended’ can of worms? Are our children going to have a voice of their own or will they be silenced as soon as they have an opinion which isn’t politically correct?

Are our future generations screwed? I think so.